GNDR Members Area

Page:  1  2  (Next)
RLT organization logo
by Mong Marma - Thursday, 11 March 2010, 10:10 AM
Anyone on this site

Dear Humanity friends,

Here many houses of indigenous burned, lost their properties and so on. We are very regret and condolence for it. We shall be very appreciate to all of you if you kindly do take action for support emergency aid to the suffered peoples they able to recover from lost etc. 

On Wednesday and Thursday, February 23-25, 2010 incidentally were happened a man-made tragedy and disaster at the Rangamati and Khagrachari in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh.  

In those days the Bangalee settlers allegedly carried out an arson attack and burned out over 50 Marma people houses at the Satbhaiya Para including Chakma houses and shops at the Mahajonpara, Narankhiya, four in Kabongpuriya and three in Narikelbagan and Bagaihat.  

It was really such a horror days we spent from February 23 to 25, 2010. Every night people thought how to go out from Khagrachari town. No mobile network...no communication between the friends....some of my colleagues were stuck at office and mid-way...separated from their families... no fire Bridget and was out of administration control.  

Over thousands indigenous victims are hiding and spend the night in the forest at the day the in taken afraid some mane and women come out to collect and waiting for relief and after evening back again to forest.  

You can find more episode information from http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=127660 and http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/index.php and http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/latest_news.php?nid=22393  February 26, 2010: http://www.thedailystar.net/newDesign/news-details.php?nid=127841    

We RLT very regret and condolence to all lost lives and properties for inhuman active and violated the indigenous rights instead of protect indigenous peoples' right.  

We are still in dangerous and tense situation has been prevailing in the town following the violence. The section-144 and curfew yesterday have withdrawn. Today behalf of RLT and me with others monitored and distributed some foods and cloths etc but it are not enough there need more aid from you.  

The victims and suffering people’s emergency need you support; foods, waters and health care and cloths and rehabilitation program.  

Please do attempt and increase your effort to normalize the situation in CHT and support the basic aid to injured, death and lost their properties and houses or for rehabilitation program especially appealed from RLT. We already colleted the information of victims and others now information is available we may provide you if your need.    

Please feel free to contact us for more information.   

Country:Bangladesh.

Region: Chittagong Hill Tracts (Khagrachari Hill District, Pankhaiya Para, KhagrachariTown,)

Contact Us: Mong Mong Thun Marma, Executive Director, Rurowa Laue Tathang (RLT), Pankyaiya Para, Khagrachari Sadar-4400, Khagrachari Hill District, Bangladesh.

Ph: 88037162116, Mobilel: 8801731385605 Email: ed_rlt@yahoo.comhttp://rltorg.webs.com (Under construction)  

We are looking forward to hear kind advice and support for victims. 

With hope, 

Mong Mong Thun Marma

Executive Director, RLT 


[ Modified: Thursday, 11 March 2010, 10:18 AM ]
Rural Organisation and Authorities Comittee and ASA
by Getro Mathieu - Monday, 18 January 2010, 09:12 PM
Anyone on this site

Dear all members,

On behalf the team of Action Secours Ambulance (ASA) and the haitian people I want to thank all of you who is trying to help our nation. Today the haitian people is facing the worst. all the pictures that you have seen are real. We were on the streets days and night try to see how to rescue people. At night people aside the street is sleeping with dead people in the other side of road. The situation is getting worst and the population is alone on streets, sleeping, eating, and you can imagine the rest for promiscuite and living without sanitation systems.

We are here and we will try our best. We were with an Minustah and Rescue team trying to argument. Communications problems,the rescuer cannot act with efficacity and ressources are duplicate and also efforts because of a serious coordination. We were in the preparation for the 2009 Hurrican season and The cluster team was ready. But they were a lack of action to redynamise the cluster, and we have asked that they run it again for this hazards.

We are there and we hope that aid will come and arrive directly to the population. All that we can say is the Team of ASA is ready to make it arrive. WE WOULD LIKE ALSO TO TELL ALL ORGANIZATIONS, GOVERMENT ORGANIZATIONS, AND ALL CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS TO ACT TO IMPLEMENT HYOGO FRAMEWORK AND CONCRETIZE RRC.

MY CONGRADULATIONS TO THE TEAM OF THE GLOBAL NETWORK:

MARCUS, TERRY, REGINE, AND ALL.

LET'S TRY OUR BEST FOR 25TH JANUARY IN LONDON.


nassej-logo
by Daud Abdi Daud - Thursday, 5 November 2009, 10:32 PM
Anyone on this site

Causes and Effects of Deforestation and
Hazardous Waste Dumping in
Somalia

 

INTRODUCTION

General

Environment is increasingly becoming an important issue in the world politics and global economy as well as people's life. Environmental deterioration
is now a global issue - ecologically, economically, politically that require global solution (Elliott, 1998).

 

Today, the most notable environmental problems in the world include global warming leading to climate change, water pollution contributing to human health problems, deforestation resulting desertification, destruction of species, ozone depletion, increasing urban and industrial wastes, etc. Human activity and life is changing the environment in ways, on scale, quite unlike in any other era, making our common future  in jeopardy. Environmental problems occur in the interaction between two complex systems, the human-society system and the ecological system. However, to preserve security, the entire human environment is taken into consideration (Graeger, 1996).

Large percentage of people's illness in poor countries is directly linked to the pollution of their natural environment. Improved environment resulting improved public health is therefore a clear element in the struggle and the strategy of poverty eradication. In general terms, population growth, economic development and growing inequality in income all put greater pressure on the ecosystems.

 

Moreover, poverty and political conflict, whish are the features of most developing countries, also cause environmental damage. Environmental degradation increases the poverty of those who are already poor especially in those parts of the world where livelihoods and lives are closely dependent on natural environment (Elliott, 1998). Globally, deforestation and illegal hazardous waste dumping, among other abuses, are human conducts bankrupting natural resources of future generations.

The Scope and the Purpose of the Paper

 

Somali is by no means an exception in the above situation. There are substantial challenges of environmental concerns in the country, which is far less studied.

 

The country suffers from almost all types of environmental degradations. In one hand, Somalia is experiencing enormous environmental problems, while on the other hand it is lacking both human and financial resources as well as political stability to address these life affecting issues. In view of these above-mentioned situations, the paper will concentrate on describing and analyzing the subject in relation to Somalia. It will particularly focus on legal and moral aspects of deforestation and hazardous waste dumping in the country. The purpose of the paper is to discuss and shed some light through analysis on deforestation and illegal hazardous waste dumping in Somalia. As methodology, literature and document review, information gathered from relevant organizations was carried out.

 

Background to Somalia

 

Located in the Horn of Africa, adjacent to the Arabian Peninsula, Somalia is geographically located in a very advantageous region, bordering both Indian Ocean and the Red Sea. Country's land area is estimated to 637 660 km2. It shares borders with Kenya, Ethiopia and Djibouti.

 

The modern history of Somalia constitutes about 120 years (1880-2000): 80 years (1880-1960) of colonial rule (Lewis, 1988) and division; 30 years (1960-1990) of democratic but mostly military rule and; 10 years (1991-2001) of chaos and State collapse. The widespread famine in Somalia in 1992-93 caused by low agricultural yield due to several years of droughts combined with bloody civil war has resulted the largest UN humanitarian efforts and peacekeeping operations in history. Despite being politically disintegrated, Somali has culturally and ethnically homogenous society. Poverty, which together with injustice is threatening the integrity of the nation, is the major root of social conflict and cause of the current political crisis in Somalia.

The country has an estimated population of about 9 million in 1995, of which 75% in rural areas. Rate of population growth is about 3%, while
Mogadishu is growing by a rate of 10% a year (World Bank, 1995). Agriculture is the second traditional occupation for most Somalis, after nomadic livestock grazing/raising. Livestock and banana export is country's two principal revenue generating sectors. Somalia has one of the lowest human development index (HDI) in the world.

 

Physical Environment

 

Most of the country is typically sparse savanna with few forested areas. According to the World Band, 55% of Somalia's land area is suitable for grazing, while the FAO estimate is lower, 29%, but still shows the greater for livestock production. Official estimates of Somalia's forest cover refer to 52,000 hectares of "dense" forest and 5.7 million hectares of "low density wood" (Somalia, 1987, ch. 7), this means that 9% of the total land is low density woodland - savanna woodlands. This is to indicate country's limited amount of wood resources, which mainly consist of Acacias trees. On the other hand, Somalia has the longest coastline of Africa, which stretches a distance of about 3300 km in both the Indian Ocean and the Red Sea. The long coastline is of importance chiefly permitting trade with the Middle East and the rest of East Africa.

 

Historical and Ongoing Country's Environmental 

 

Somalia is currently experiencing almost all types of environmental concerns, both natural and man-made.

Natural Environmental Problems:


Indicating the level of water scarcity, rainfall is very low (250 mm/y) and variable, while the potential evaporation is extremely very high (over 2000 mm/y).

 

Droughts that occur very frequent are naturally caused by climate. It leads to water shortage and starvation particularly for the rural communities, which are more dependent on rainwater and grass for their survival in livestock raising and cultivation traditions. Being a natural disaster, drought causes loss of life both human and animal every year in Somalia. Deadly droughts is often followed by devastating floods, another natural disaster, which mainly severely affects southern part of the country, where the two rivers, the Juba and the Shabelle, flow. These recurrent drought and severe floods affect the lives of the people and their animals without prediction and prevention.

Man-made Environmental Problems:


Human-induced environmental abuses include: water pollution contributing to human health problems; alarming deforestation and overgrazing resulting desertification and soil erosion; salinisation by inefficient irrigation destroying valuable productive land; illegal fishing and industrial toxic waste dumping in the sea and coastline areas by outsiders; improper disposal of human and solid waste by local people affecting the public health; hunting and extinction of wildlife; and degradation of coastal zones. Increasing population living along the coastline put a significant pressure on coastal aquifers for freshwater supply. Vast marine resources are under unprecedented threat from overexploitation and pollution by outsiders.

 

No Environmental Agency Ever Established:


Despite of these major concerns, no central (governmental) coordinating body charged with environmental protection exist, even prior to the collapse of the state in 1991. However, several ministries and state agencies were concerned with protection and management of the environment as part of their function during the period before the civil war.

 

National Parks Agency was established in 1970 for the purpose of establishing parks and reserve area. There was no however a single protected area listed in the country as late as 1991 (UNEP, 1993). The National Range Agency, founded in 1976, was empowered, inter alia, to establish grazing and drought reserves, and to prevent and control soil erosion on the range.

Among the limited range of concrete steps taken was the prohibition in 1969 of charcoal and firewood export, in order to protect trees. This was amended in 1972 to give a monopoly of charcoal exports to the National Commercial Agency Prior to the state collapse, the Ministry of Fisheries and Marine Resources, founded in 1977, was responsible for prevention pollution of the sea. However, the capacity to control the long coastline was always lacking and no control of pollution has even existed.

 

2. DEFORESTATION in Somalia

 

Deforestation - The Result of Charcoal

 

Charcoal plays an important role in both the energy sectors and the economies of most African countries. Charcoal making provides a considerable amount of employment in rural areas; it also allows for a quick return on investments.

 

However, the inefficiencies inherent to the production and use of charcoal place a heavy strain on local wood resources, resulting severe environmental consequences. In many parts of the world, the use of charcoal has been blamed for deforestation in the drier parts of Africa has led to an even worse problem - desertification and the loss of thousands of species. Deforestation is the product of the interaction of many environmental, social, political, economic and cultural forces at work in any given region.

 

SOMALIA - Deforested Country

 

During the last several years, a new type of business was introduced in Somalia. Cutting of trees to produce charcoal for export to the Gulf States has become a big business with considerable profits. In order to optimize the operation, local businessmen introduced a new technology - battery-powered chain saws for cutting of the forests.

 

Trees are cut down, burn and brought by trucks for export from major ports in the country, particularly Mogadishu, Kismayo and Bosaso (BBC, 2000; and local newspapers) Becoming Somalia's black gold, traders earn about $US million per ship (IRIN, 2000). Most of the charcoal is made in southern Somalia, while northern and eastern regions also experience the same problem but to a lesser extent. More than 80% of the trees used for charcoal are types of Acacia, the most dominant species (IRIN, 2000). Due to absence of government, there is no documentation of the volumes being exported or the amount of trees being cut down.

 

Causes Behind the Conduct

 

The alarming rate of deforestation has a number of combined causes behind it. It is evident that it is largely a combination of human activities and social conditions.

 

Charcoal for Urban and Firewood for Rural:


Somalia has the lowest consumption of modern forms of energy in the Sub-Saharan Africa Firewood and charcoal are the major sources of energy for the majority of the people in Somalia. As a result of this, the removal of trees in Somalia is steadily increasing, following demographic trends, which are reversing the traditional Somali nomadic way of life, as well as other social crisis. As their source of energy, rural people rely on firewood while urban inhabitants use charcoal. Mogadishu's charcoal supply comes mainly from the south. In rural areas, strong link between poverty and deforestation exist. Like other countries in Sub-Sahara Africa, Somalia is presently, as well as in the past, suffering from energy problems. Power and fuels cut-off have been frequent in all urban centers, access to electricity have also been poor or unreliable, if not absent.

 

Potential Energy Resources - Un-exploited Sources:


Yet Somalia is rich in energy resources, having un-exploited reserves of oil and natural gas, untapped hydropower, extensive geothermal energy resources, many promising wind sites, and abundant sunshine, which can produce solar power. Despite all these, traditional biomass fuels - mainly firewood and charcoal, the smoky and inefficient fuels of the poor - account for 82% of the country's total energy consumption (Makakis, 1998 p.74). Technically, it would not be problem to develop these potentially available energy resources. Major obstacles are today political, financial and institutional.

 

Foreign Demand for Charcoal - the Major Driving Force:
Traditionally, the making of charcoal was limited to a small group of cutters who used hand axes and responded to an internal and very localized demand, which during the last several years started to increase. In spite of increases in local consumption, foreign demand for charcoal puts unprecedented pressure on locally limited wood resources.

 

Taking full advantage of country's lawless condition, interest-driven local businessmen with commercial links in the Gulf countries export tremendous amount of charcoal to mainly Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Charcoal from dry land in poor Somalia is used in the houses of the Gulf countries as luxurious.

Lack of Government - An
Opportunity for Outsiders
:
Being without government since 1991 when the former regime was overthrown,
Somalia is the only country in modern history of the world which lacked central government so long. Since then the country is ruled by a series of rival warlords each holding a small territory of the country.

 

This created a condition which the country became stateless vulnerable for anyone's exploitation particularly outsiders and local self-interest-driven individuals. This lack of functional system of government and control facilitated these individuals to run these unsustainable business activities damaging local natural environment. Lack of government in Somalia could therefore be seen as the major cause of the ongoing deforestation.

 

The Issue of Land - Legal Perspectives:

 
Institutional arrangement that specify rules, rights and obligation for the use of natural resources are called property rights regimes (Bromley, 1991; Hanna, 1999). During the rule of the last regime (1969-1991), government have tended to try to increase their control in land previously owned collectively by the communities in the rural areas. This was done through shifting the land-ownership from communal to state in pursuit of revenues. By the 1975 Land Law, all land in
Somalia is nationalized. The new Law demands mandatory land registration which traditional landholders resisted.

 

Consequently this has progressively limited local rights rather than supported. As the state authorities lacked capacities to manage and control the nationalized land, this legislation (of making the land a state property) made the land no man's land with open-access type of property-rights regime. The effect of that 1975 Land Law is therefore highly relevant for the ongoing land degradation. After the state collapse in 1991, the result became the creation of 'ownerless' land with open-access to anyone's exploitation which accelerated, among other abuses, the rate of deforestation.

 

The land property which the state of Somalia had claimed as its own and which the rulers had exploited during the military regime now became fair game for the new power brokers. Now as the people increase dramatically and some of the land naturally and antropogenically became degraded, new land with life-supporting-resource are required. Struggle for such a land thus became one of the major sources of the present conflic. Common resources, such as forest, which is free and open for all, tend to be vulnerable to depletion and degradation due to overuse and misuse, this is commonly referred to as "the tragedy of commons" (Hardin, 1968).

 

Adverse Environmental Consequences of Deforestation

 

The illegal removal of trees in Somalia to produce charcoal for export is an action destroying the common national capital, which the society does not benefit. Although public awareness of the impact of the deforestation in Somalia has increased in recent years through media, it has not slowed the alarming rate of deforestation appreciably. As a result of deforestation, land suitable for grazing is destroyed. This will inevitably affect the nomadic communities who entirely depend on grazing. The most visible results of this action are desertification, soil erosion, and general environmental degradation. The highest price will be the long-term effect in desertification.

The valuable role of trees in controlling runoff and water and the positive interaction of acacias with crops and animals are reasons why much more emphasis needs to be given to the forest protection. Deforestation will have major adverse impacts on rainfall availability, capacity of the soil to hold water, local climate, and habitat for animal species and bio-diversity. Basically, humans abandon areas that have been cleared, particularly when the community is nomadic depending on grazing for their animals. All these will finally collectively affect the livelihood and socio-economic aspect of the society.

In addition to environmental impacts, deforestation as an income-generating activity also causes internal dispute and conflict within the society. In 1997, actions taken by local chiefs and clan elders in areas in central Somalia who tried to prohibit charcoal cutting led to conflict, that resulted loss of life (IRIN, 2000).

 

3. ILLEGAL HAZARDOUS WASTE DUMPING in Somalia

 

Hazardous Waste and Illegal Dumping

 

World's chemical industries and nuclear energy plantshave already generated millions of tons of hazardous wastes. Industrialized countries generate over 90% of the world's hazardous wastes (WCED, 1987). The high growth of industries in developed countries was accompanied by an equally high increase in the production of toxic hazardous wastes. But the technological capacity to handle these by-products - wastes, was not developing by the same level. This is the reason why problem of these wastes, particularly nuclear wastes, still remains unsolved. Taking advantage of political instability and high level of corruption but lured by the potential financial gains, poor African nationshave been used as the dumping sites for hazardous toxic waste materials from developed countries. In some cases, the income generated from this trade, of importing hazardous waste from the West, have exceeded the GNP of many poor countries. Poverty is the reason of accepting importation of toxic wastes. Bearing the cost of the damage caused by the hazardous wastes, Africa disbenefit the entire attempt of generating revenue to alleviate poverty. This do-or-die method become an alternative solution to the desperate search for revenue for some African countries, which are ill-equipped to dispose these health and environment threatening wastes. Both the exporting and importing counterparts violated international treaties to which most countries in the world are signatories.

 

SOMALIA - World's Most Attractive Illegal Hazardous Waste Dumping Site

 

During the Somali civil war, hazardous wastes were dumped in industrialized countries. In the fall of 1992 reports began to appear in the international media concerning unnamed European firms that were illegally dumping hazardous waste in Somalia. What caused controversy in 1992 were reports of a contract established by European firms with local warlords. The alleged perpetrators were Italian and Swiss firms who entered contracts with Somali warlords and businessmen to dump waste in the country.

 

Investigations by the UNEP


In a news release statement (Tolba, 1992) by then executive director of the UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) situated in Nairobi, Dr. Mustafa Kamal Tolba, it became apparent that the European firms was disposing a hazardous waste in Somalia. The UNEP started to investigate the matter five years later in 1997 and hired Mahdi Geddi Qayad as a team leader (for a period of one month) to carry a field investigation in many areas of Somalia particularly coastal zones. The outcome of the investigation (a report) was not published but an Italian newspaper has succeeded to receive a copy of the report.

 

Familgia Cristiana - an Italian Newspaper
Familgia Cristiana - an Italian Newspaper, has published several articles about the issue during 1998 (Familgia Cristiana, 1998). Based on the UNEP investigations as well as its own investigation, the newspaper gave relatively a detailed description. Familgia Cristiana (1998c) showed a map over the country particularly areas where wastes have been dumped and pictures taken from places where signs of the dumping could still be seen. According to the newspaper, waste dumping concentrated both in coastal zones and inland areas. Naming several individuals both Somalis and foreigners who involved in the waste transport, the newspaper disclosed many secrets in the business both in terms of deals made and health impacts on local people. In an $80 million contract in late 1991, two Swiss and Italian firms, Achair Partners and Progresso, would be allowed by senior local politicians at the time to build a 10 million ton storage facility for hazardous waste at the rate of 500 000 tons a year. Although the major part of the waste dumping in Somalia occurred after the state collapse in 1991, the activity has started even during the former regime in 1989 (Familgia Cristiana, 1998d).

According to the newspaper, there are ongoing dumping activities inside the country, and Mr. Halifa Omar Darameh of the UNEP said "our concerns are the negative consequences that these dumping can cause in the immediate future, and it is unfortunately impossible to safeguard a long coastline of
3 300 km long".

 

Parliamentary Report


In view of these serious waste dumping allegations against the Italian and Swiss firms, the Italian Parliament demanded a study on the issue. A commission has been established. The final report (produced in 2000) of the parliamentary study said the so-called "Eco-Mafia" run companies dealing with 35 million tons of waste a year, making $US 6.6 million. According to the report, radioactive waste from Italy dumped in Somalia may have affected Italian soldiers based there with a UN force in the mid-1990s. The report also disclosed that the Mafia controls about 30 percent of Italy
's waste disposal companies, including toxic waste, according to a parliamentary study.

Why Dumping in
Somalia


Several European companies are engaged in the business of dumping industrial and chemical wastes in
Somalia. The relevant question is why is it that waste-dealers and importers ignore the long-term effect and obvious dangers associated with illegal dumping of toxic wastes in poor countries. But the more relevant question is why dumping in Somalia? Reasons that made Somalia world's most attractive waste dumping site are many and below are the most likely ones:

·         Country's political situation: Since 1991 Somalia is lacking a central government that can safeguard its long coastlines and large territories. This seems to be the most likely reason that attracted the waste-dealers to use Somalia as a dumping site for the waste generated elsewhere.

·         The need to find dumping site: Generally, there is a big problem of finding suitable dumping sites within the countries generating these wastes, as there are few areas left there. By finding a cheap site, the high costs of recycling, incinerating and disposing in original country could be avoided. According to a study by American University of Washington (1996), the cost of disposing one ton of hazardous waste in their source of generation was estimated to US$ 3000 and as low as US$ 5 in a developing country.

·         Geographical Location: Located in a very geographically central location, It is easy to reach Somalia. This reduces the cost and the time of waste transport.

·         Low public awareness about the dumping: During these years local people are in civil war associated social problems, which made them busy in their life affairs. Local media was not so effective. There were also fears of talking about the issue in the media.

·         Local self-interest individuals: It was easy to establish local contacts (politicians and businessmen) who are ready to allow the dumping of these toxic waste in their home country despite the long-term effects of the dumping on the local people, in only exchange for a relatively enormous amount of money in foreign currency, in a short period of time. This facilitates the disposal process.

 

Negative Environmental Consequences and Impacts on Related Issues

 

The effects of hazardous wastes dumped improperly on both human and other environmental components are inestimable. According to the newspaper (Familgia Cristiana, 1998), UNEP investigations and local people, the health effects so far identified are enormous. These include (i) the death of fisherman in the town of Brawe after opening a small container collected from the sea, (ii) the death of several people living the along the coastline who drunk water in a container, (iii) the increase of patients with cancer in Somalia, which were related to the toxicity of the wastes dumped in the country. In addition, a study made by an Algerian expert explained the link between the recent years' increase in livestock's death and the toxic waste dumping in the country. Dr. Pirko of the UNICEF said that the town of Bardere experienced unknown disease that caused the death of 120 people after suffering noise bleedings. This was also related to the toxicity. Premature births that occurred were due to the high toxicity of the dumpsite.

However, no research has been carried out on the existing and the potential environmental and social impacts of the waste dumping. The negative long-term impacts are expecting to be huge particularly pollution of the groundwater and fish resources, which will inevitably affect the overall public health and the entire socio-economy of the country.

International Legal Instruments of Hazardous Wastes

 

The issue of waste dumping in Somalia is twofold in that it is both a moral and legal questions. First, it is ethically questionable to dump a toxic waste in a very poor country in the midst of a protracted civil war with no central government. Being against moral principles, these conducts are beyond humanity and games played on the lives of innocent people. Second, there is a violation of international law in the export of hazardous waste to Somalia. Below are the international and regional laws regulating the waste transport.

 

The Basel Convention


The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal is a broad and significant international treaty on hazardous waste. It was adopted in 1989 and entered into force on May 1992. The Basel Convention, ratified by 135 countries, is the response of the international communities to the problems caused by the ever increasing toxic wastes which are hazardous to people and the environment. Italy and Switzerland, whose private firms have been accused to dump waste in Somalia, are parties to the Convention, while Somalia is not. Regulating the transboundary movement of hazardous wastes and providing obligation to its parties to ensure that such wastes are disposed of in an environmentally sound manner, one of the main principles of the Convention is that the hazardous waste should be treated and disposed of as close as possible to their source of generation. In addition, the Basel Convention urges that the generation and movement of hazardous waste should be minimized.

 

OAU Ban on Waste TransportAfrica.


Equally important and with more regional significance was the voting of a resolution by the Organization of African Unity (OAU) to ban member countries from accepting industrial waste products. Half of members of the OAU are non-signatories of the Basel Convention. Despite the OAU's attempt to ban such trade, member countries have violated the ban. The reasons for doing so are based on economics; the need to generate substantial amounts of revenue to alleviate the economic hardships faced by

nassej-logo
by Daud Abdi Daud - Monday, 2 November 2009, 08:26 PM
Anyone on this site

NASSEJ joins the Global Network of Civil Society Organizations for Disaster Reduction

 

The newly established National Association of Somali Science and Environmental Journalists (NASSEJ) joined the Global Network of Civil Society Organizations for Disaster Reduction.

 

NASSEJ is the legitimate and representative organ and voice of science and environmental journalists in Somalia.

 

About the Network

 

The Global Network of Civil Society Organizations for Disaster Reduction is a major international network of civil society organizations committed to working together to influence and implement disaster risk reduction policy and practice at the local, national and international levels. 600 people from 300 organizations in 90 countries are already involved. Our strength lies in the commitment, diversity of skills and experience and extensive reach of our membership, particularly at the local level across virtually every region of the world.

Members work for a broad range of organizations ranging from local or community-based groups, national and international NGOs, through to academic and research institutions. Many within the network serve on their own national and regional networks, alliances and associations.

For more details please visit: www.nassej.org 

nassej-logo
by Daud Abdi Daud - Sunday, 1 November 2009, 09:13 PM
Anyone on this site

World’s Largest Malaria Conference Opens with Research Aimed at Eradication

 

New findings include new technologies in the pipeline, growing drug and insecticide resistance and shocking inaccessibility to life-saving drugs for a disease that continues to kill 2400 people every day

NAIROBI, 1 November 2009 – The world’s largest malaria conference opened today with a call for substantial and sustained support for research to guide evidence-based policies and the development of new malaria tools, which together could save countless lives.

The 5th Multilateral Initiative on Malaria (MIM) Pan-African Conference brings together 2,000 researchers, health workers, public health officials, policymakers and activists from across Africa and around the world. Kenya’s Vice-President Kalonzo Musyoka opened the conference. The first MIM conference to be held in four years, it will highlight the latest research in malaria prevention and treatment.

“The theme of this year’s conference is ‘Building Knowledge for Action’, but the key question for malaria is ‘which knowledge for which action?’” said Dr. Adrian JF Luty, Senior Researcher at Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, the Netherlands, and Chair of the MIM conference Scientific Committee. “If we as a global community are to be ready to achieve eradication, we must invest in the science that can guide these efforts and provide the tools and methods that will make success possible.”

Although preventable and treatable, malaria continues to be one of the world’s most deadly and persistent diseases.  Ninety percent of all malaria deaths occur in Africa, and 85 percent of these deaths are among children under the age of five. 

Since the last MIM conference in 2005, the global community has made tremendous strides against the disease. Yet despite this progress, many African countries are struggling to meet Millennium Development Goal 6, which aims “to halt and begin to reverse the incidence of malaria,” and are unlikely to meet the WHO target to halve malaria mortality by 2010.

One of the key goals of MIM, and the conference, is to strengthen African research capacity to guide policies for malaria control and to develop new tools for prevention and treatment.  

Research conducted in Africa has helped guide new practices, for example, in Rwanda where just 5 years ago malaria was the leading cause of death. Thanks to a multi-faceted approach using long-lasting insecticide treated nets (LLINs) and training for community health workers, has decreased the malaria death rate by 60 percent in just two years. In Zanzibar, a mass distribution of LLINs in early 2006 and insecticide spraying programs triggered a 95 percent reduction in malaria infections for children under 2 years of age.

“Over the past four years, new strategies coupled with unprecedented global attention and support from endemic country governments have increased access to malaria treatment and prevention for some of the world’s most vulnerable communities,“ said Dr. Francine Ntoumi, MIM Secretariat Coordinator at the African Malaria Network Trust (AMANET), which has hosted the MIM secretariat for the past four years as the organization’s first African secretariat. “However, we must continue to build a critical mass of scientists working on malaria in Sub-Saharan Africa, so that countries with the greatest burden are themselves setting the research agenda.”

Due to continued cost and availability challenges, those most at-risk for malaria often have limited access to proven prevention tools, such as insecticide-treated nets and access to the current gold-standard drug, artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs). As a result, the disease disproportionately affects poor rural communities in malaria-endemic countries.

At the same time, over-use of artemisinin monotherapies and irrational use of ACTs themselves are leading to increased drug resistance.

Expanding access to insecticides—and agricultural use of insecticides—is also putting evolutionary pressure on mosquitoes to develop resistance to the most effective malaria control methods available: insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS). New classes of insecticides and malaria drugs that overcome today’s resistance are still in early stages of development.

“The threat of increased parasite resistance to the malaria drug artemisinin, and insecticide resistance in mosquitoes, could undo the important progress we have made on malaria,” said Dr. Solomon Mpoke, Acting-Director of the Kenya Medical Research Institute, (KEMRI), the host of this year’s MIM conference.

 “Operational research to be presented at MIM will be crucial to demonstrate what works and where, while scientific research on improved drugs, diagnostics, vaccines and vector control methods will point the way to our best hopes for eradication. Eradicating malaria will not be easy—it will require substantial funding and a complementary arsenal of knowledge and tactics.

To attain this goal, we must continue to support innovative research while simultaneously addressing barriers to access that keep so many from receiving life-saving prevention and treatment tools we have right now.”

nassej-logo
by Daud Abdi Daud - Wednesday, 28 October 2009, 08:07 PM
Anyone in the world

23rd October, 2009-Nairobi, Kenya.

 Key Overall Developments   

Intensive fighting in Mogadishu on 23 October killed an estimated 30 people and wounded 70 others, mostly civilians. According to media reports, several mortar rounds allegedly fired by insurgent groups landed near Aden Adde International Airport in Medina district. In response, African Union Mission for Somalia (AMISOM) forces reportedly shelled parts of Mogadishu, including business and residential areas in Hodan and Howl Wadaag districts. The fighting erupted along Maka Al Mukarama road that connects the Villa Somalia Presidential compound and Mogadishu's Aden Adde International Airport at the time when President Sheikh Sharif Ahmed's convoy was driving towards the airport. Both sides reportedly used heavy weapons. The spokesman for AMISOM in Mogadishu denied that AMISOM shelled residential areas and Bakara market.

According to the latest (issued 21 October) Somalia Food Security Outlook report by the Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWSNET), the current food security situation in Somalia is not expected to change through March 2010.  The Report states that the most likely scenario, of normal to above-normal rains between October and December, due to El Nino, could end the prolonged drought and improve water and pasture availability. Given the increased availability of water and pasture in most key grazing areas, a significant reduction in pastoral household expenditure on water and migration is expected during the January to March 2010 period. However, recovery from the current drought in Bakool, Hiraan, Galgaduud, Mudug, Nugaal, Sool, Sanaag, and Togdheer regions is not expected during the next six months, as cattle and camel require several seasons of normal rainfall to calve and produce milk. Therefore, the population in these regions will continue to face extreme levels of food insecurity in the coming six months.

WFP urgently requires 215,000 metric tones of food valued at US$193 million to continue with food assistance for 3.5 million vulnerable Somalis for the next six months. The current requirements are based on the revised needs estimated by the August country-wide comprehensive inter-agency assessment led by the Food Security and Nutrition Analysis Unit for Somalia. With such critical shortfalls vulnerable Somalis may starve, malnutrition will rise, and people will become more prone to disease and the death rate may increase. A disruption of humanitarian food assistance to Somalia is also likely to trigger mass cross-border population movements. WFP Somalia is prioritizing assistance to IDPs, institutional feeding, and nutritional support with any new funding contribution.

Walter Kaelin, the Representative of the UN Secretary General on the Human Rights of Internally Displaced Persons, completed his mission to Somalia.  During his mission (14 and 21 October), he visited the Dadaab refugee camp in Kenya, where he met with new arrivals from South/Central Somalia. In Somalia he met with IDPs in Gaalkacyo, Bossaso, and Hargeysa. He also consulted with the TFG and the administrations of Somaliland and Puntland, and met with humanitarian agencies and civil society representatives. Mr. Kaelin raised concerns about the limited support to IDPs in Somalia and said that “the lack of humanitarian access to those most in need, dangers for humanitarian workers, such as abductions, as well as a sharp decline in donor contributions exacerbate this long-standing humanitarian crisis and risk bringing it to a hitherto unknown level”.  He underscored that all actors must grant humanitarian access, ensure the safety of humanitarian workers, and not impede the already limited delivery of urgently needed humanitarian aid. Mr. Kaelin further suggested that, to the extent possible, humanitarian agencies must shift their operations from Nairobi to Puntland, Somaliland and other areas from where affected regions can be serviced.

According to UNHCR, a total of 34,000 people have been displaced throughout Somalia since 1 September 2009, 17,000 from Mogadishu.  Roughly 13,500 people left Mogadishu to other parts of the country while 3,400 moved to relatively safer areas within the city.

Response

All 16 wet feeding (cooked meals) centres in Mogadishu are now operational. The sixteenth site “Abdul-Aziz” re-opened this week after it was relocated near the main administrative office of the local partner SAACID. With the exception of the last site, all wet feeding centers have been operational since the last week of July. WFP has continued to provide the dried food commodities for the partners to provide hot meals to vulnerable Somalis. During the past week, the 16 centres produced a total of 413,437 meals. Monitoring of the programme indicates that each recipient receives three standard scoops of porridge, which is shared with 4.5 other people including themselves. This actually means that at minimum, the food quota that is meant for 80,000 people per day is actually feeding in full or in part some 320,917 each day. Fifty-five percent of the recipients of the meals are female and 40% percent of the total beneficiaries are children. Adult males are only five percent.

WFP and partners distributed 459 metric tones of assorted food commodities to 43,110 beneficiaries under general food distribution in Nugal, Sool and Sanaag regions in northern Somalia. An additional 40,020 beneficiaries received 446 metric tones of assorted food commodities under general food distribution in Jalalaqsi and Gahareri Districts of Hiraan and Galgaduud regions respectively.

UNICEF, in collaboration with local the NGO SOPHPA, scaled-up chlorination activities in Mogadishu including Daynile area, Kax-Shiiqal IDP settlement, and along the Afgooye Corridor. Chlorine dosages were increased to higher acceptable limits, to provide more stringent protective measures against acute watery diarrhoea. SOPHPA is also using their own ‘chlorinators’ to monitor and chlorinate wells in addition to the routine chlorination carried out by well owners/operators.

UNICEF and partners continue to respond to water shortages across Somalia. More than 7,000 people in Warshiek and Adale districts, Middle Shabelle, have access to safe drinking water following the construction of ten new shallow wells and the rehabilitation of 15 existing shallow wells. Training on operating and maintaining solar pumps to sustain ten solar water systems is benefiting 10,000 people.

During the reporting period, UNICEF and partners distributed Plumpy’doz to 13,068 children in Lughaye, Borama and Berbera districts in Somaliland, and to 9,743 IDP children in Bossaso. Plumpy’doz is a highly nutritious ‘ready to use food’ that helps in the prevention of acute malnutrition. Plumpy'doz distribution will commence in South/Central Somaliland in November targeting 108,000 of the most vulnerable children.

For further information in English, contact: Rita Maingi on +254 734 800 120 – maingir@un.org. In Somali or English, contact Muna Mohamed on + 254 733 643 737 – mohamed26@un.org

Picture of marcus oxley
by marcus oxley - Tuesday, 13 October 2009, 01:28 PM
Anyone on this site

Now back in London after almost two weeks at the UN Climate Change talks. As has been commented by others - though some progress was achieved the most pressing questions remain unaswered;

On the climate mitigation side the critical determination of emission reduction targets remains unresolved. Mitigation is essential to make adaptation feasible.

On the adaptation side the scale and source of adpatation funding is not yet clear, nor have issues such as prioritisation of the most vulnerable, or the form of the financial mechanism to provide the necessary financial support.

If governments now omit to mobilise the political will that is needed to break the deadlock the only choice is for difficult issues to be left until post-Copenhagen. These are not easy problems to resolve given the divisions between delegates and countries in many ways reflected the divisions in a grossly inquitable and divided world - between rich and poor, haves and have nots.

The revised negotiating text is due to come out at the end of next week (23rd Oct). It remains to be seen what principles, objectives and approaches related to risk reduction will remain in the latest draft. Once the new draft is available I'll circulate, highlight the critical areas and provide some comments relevant to the DRR community. All in all a fascinating insight into geo-politics although issues of justice and equity and fundamental changes to our current development path appeared along way from the negotiating table.

Rural Organisation and Authorities Comittee and ASA
by Getro Mathieu - Monday, 12 October 2009, 09:05 PM
Anyone on this site

Dear All members,

We are facing a galaxie challenge regarding the problems to be resolve immediately and the interests to be share immediately. But the case is the problems if they are not resolve will generate more and we just have to imagine the first consequences of the first problems that will push humans to change they life style.

Just makes a comparaison : PROBs TO RESOLVE / INTERESTs TO SHARE

What is the best way to choose? The differences between the quality of health to procure, the quality of safe environement, the quality to produce revenue to respond for the needs behold the world is great.

The quality of thoughts is to be wise for the implementation of the right response for the right community and the right time regarding the right situation and problems. If we have to change something is NOW  not tomorrow. The technics should provide the senarios, not the way to act. Then we will be able to see how many time we lost and how a little time we have. How to know to do not flow on the windows money to build climate change assesment?  A little CONSCIENCE, HEART, and CONSIDERATION for the future. The senarios will determine the future because in the PAST we acted to retrieve those senarios, only US also Can Change IT.

LET 'S TOGETHER CHANGE US TO CHANGE THE FUTURE FOR CLIMATE CHANGE.

                    " LIFE is important, it might be Protect "  - Life Comes First

Picture of Abhishek Mendiratta
by Abhishek Mendiratta - Wednesday, 7 October 2009, 01:54 PM
Anyone on this site

Dear Members,

I think Climate change is really a challenge for all of us.I think UN organizations are not able to handle it properly.The practical climate change plan is not yet developed and implemented.The most of their funding is going to academic institution who are wasting money in studying and establishing that climate change is reality.I think our real focus is on practical task which can be easily carried out to stop climate change eg planting trees,cleaning rivers that may disappear etc..Hence the practical view to stop climate change should be immediately implemented and no more funds should be dispersed for impractical tasks,confrences,travel etc.

with best regards,
Abhishek Mendiratta

Picture of marcus oxley
by marcus oxley - Wednesday, 7 October 2009, 05:51 AM
Anyone on this site

Wednesday 7th Oct am

The intense negotiations on the adaptation text continues. Unfortunately lack of concensus between the different negotiating blocks and within the country grouping means progress is slow. It's not possible for me to give you a detailed analysis of proceedings as i feel only the people who have followed this process over a period of time have a real handle on all the different political nuances and postering going on here.

As an outside observor it appears the countries poviding the funding want strong guiding principles and qualifications to ensure their resources go to where they want them to go. To the developing countries this appears as conditionality on what thehy believe are resources owed to them by the industralised nations for the damage they have done. They argue it is for national governments to define where and how the funding is spent. So clauses like prioritising the most vulnerablre becomes a contested point. The USA for example see adaptation funding is additional ODA. Developing countires see it more as compensation rather than AID.

The good news is that risk reduction to reduce vulnerablilty to gradual change and extreme weather events is still in the text and likely to remain so in one quise or another. It is also clear that an ability to measure impact at the local level will be critical to supporting the effective execution of adaptation actions. Plenty of opportunities for shared learning here...

More later

Marcus

Page:  1  2  (Next)